|
Coach Flip Naumburg's Journal
Friday, June 3, 2005
EVERYBODYS FIGHTIN ABOUT A SPOONFULL (Cream)
The other day I spent most of the day in a legal deposition. There is a lawsuit going on
between lacrosse industry competitors Warrior and STX. I have done this sort of thing before.
Last time I testified it was a year and a half ago when it was Warrior vs. de beer (Gait),
and I was sitting across the table from the great Paul Gait on that one.
Obviously there is much that I cannot say about all of this, but I have to write something.
THE HOBBYIST
Now that I have gone through this lacrosse deposition thing twice it occurred to me that
its almost like having a hobby. Fighting over whom was the Mother of an Invention
is to me a most interesting part of judicial practice. The process of patent punching and
counter punching in the lacrosse ring both fascinates and amuses me. It is mentally challenging
and it can be nerve stimulating to be deposed. Make no mistake, however, I would not be
interested in giving depositions for a living. This time there were two attorneys, a stenographer,
and yours truly present for the proceedings.
LIL OLD ME?
The squabbling parties were kind enough to come all the way to Denver from Virginia and
Michigan for a rendezvous with me at the Airport Marriott. We sat together and did the depositioning
in a conference room there.
FUNNY STRANGE OR FUNNY HAH HAH?
The funny part about all this battling is that it happens to be part of a small lacrosse
world war going on over something I basically drew on a piece of legal paper (not even a
whole legal pad) in the mid 1970s. I had it folded up and carried it with me for years.
I thought about it for years, too, developing a three dimensional vision in my mind from
the "stick drawing" in my pocket. I had already built a wooden chair in the form
of a lacrosse stick by 1976. Stringing that giant pocket for people to sit in was about
the most fun I had ever had. I digress.
I was fortunate enough later on to get an opportunity to actually build my little lacrosse
stick idea and develop it into reality in the early 90s with Warrior Lacrosse. They
(Warrior) were basically still in diapers at the time. I am and forever will be grateful
that they "found" and came to me in Vail back in 1993.
People have been fighting about this particular thing for almost 12 years now. Who knew?
WHOS SIDE ARE YOU ON ANYWAY?
I made a deal and I signed a contract with Warrior many years ago. All documents concerning
the patent that is in question have David Morrows (Warrior) name on them as well as
mine. What that basically means financially is that I sold the patent to him and them.
Several weeks ago the attorney for Warrior called me and asked if I would do another deposition
for a new trial and I agreed. He called me later on to confirm that "He would represent
me again", where it would take place, and would that be okay and all that. I was eager
to "help", but the fact that he said he was going to "represent me"
sort of set me off. It sounded like he thought he was doing something for me, or at least
it did to me.
I have nothing to gain financially from all of this. I have no complaints either. I made
a deal with Warrior, and Im still happy with it 12 years later. All I ever had was
an idea and a dream. I didnt reinvent the game.
I took offense that the lawyer for Warrior would portray me as some kind of independent
witness that he would be there to help out or whatever. I was not the only "deposer"
(sorry) for that last case to be sure, but the check that came down from that when the dust
had all settled into a pre-trial settlement was for $1.2 million. It was a check that was
made out to Warrior, and none of that had trickled down to me as far as I could see.
On both deposition occasions I was asked hundreds of questions by the "other"
counsel and none, that would be not even one, by Warriors. There must be some reason
for that. I dont mind doing this for nothing, but you cant also say that Im
nothing. Of course I made my feelings quite clear and he appreciated them, and that plus
79 cents will buy me a cup of coffee at JJs.
After all and by the way, the Warrior legal counsel had brought me a check this time from
his firm for what I did the last time. It was for $85. I guess that is the witness fee I
am entitled to without any sort of added fleecing.
TOO FUNNY
During the deposition I am constantly given and shown items or documents that are "exhibits".
Each one of these exhibits has its own number assigned to it.
They showed me a rendering that I had drawn on a sheet of artists paper torn from
its ringed binder 12 years ago. I chuckled, or maybe the better word is shuddered, almost
embarrassed by my lack of drawing skill. "Do you recognize this?" I say, "Yes".
This is important. I had spent the night before reading everything said at the last deposition,
and the thing that stuck out most was that I had said, "Uh huh" about a thousand
times, at which time the attorney would always say, "You have to say yes". I can
see why. Uh huh probably reads a lot like uh uh, and that could be confusing.
If you want to see how big of a jerk you really are, try reading a transcript of yourself
sometime.
So, I recognized the drawing because I did it. Then he handed me a large document (patent
language) complete with line numbers, column numbers, and claim numbers all put there just
to get you to the right place on the verbage "map". Then he proceeds to ask me
questions that relate my lame ass drawing to this huge body of thousands of more or less
perfectly chosen words. Im sorry, but I just find that amusing or somehow ironic.
The whole design claim process is eventually put in the hands of people (lawyers) that know
very little more about the game than the words used technically in defining the lacrosse
equipment that everyone is fighting about. That seems a little weird to me as well.
WHAT IT IS
What really happens in this deposition thing is that the "other guys" come out
here, and their greatest hope would be that I am and proceed to look the part of an idiot
all through the dispo, er deposition. That would help "them" the most. My theory,
and no one told me this, is that the less I look mentally inefficient the quicker it will
all be over. I can only begin to describe what kind of motivation that is for someone like
me.
I am not the biggest sit-in-meetings-all-day kind of guy, but I admit that in a very strange
way I enjoyed both of these experiences.
BY GEORGE I THINK IVE GOT IT
I went down to Denver to meet with Counsel the night before the deposition. We talked about
and went over a bunch of things. At one point I became extremely uncomfortable with what
he was saying, and it was probably because I didnt really understand exactly what
he was talking about, but at any rate I went immediately into a detailed description of
the recent saga with my CSU lacrosse team. He understands what we do. He is a Michigan graduate.
Apparently they (MDIA member Michigan) are on the radio there in Ann Arbor/Detroit from
time to time. Anyway, I basically told him that all I could do was give honest answers to
questions that I understood. He said that was all he wanted too.
I am way too truthful about the way I see things. Many will attest to that fact with little
gray area. For the most part I am really bad at pretending I did, said, or thought things
that I did not.
There is a reason my grandfather and my uncle both were given the name George Washington
Naumburg. I went on to name my own last son George, although adding Washington in there
as the middle name was never a possibility, but thats a whole other story. Anyway,
I just got it, it is the "I cannot tell a lie", and that whole cherry tree thing.
About some things perhaps I am ultimately perhaps honest to a fault, beyond George, or at
least by George.
Next Entry | Previous
Entry
Flip Started Blogging Before it was Cool, Read Over 400 of His Entries Since January 2001 Jump to a Period: 2006: Jan Feb Mar
Apr May June
July Aug Sept
Oct Nov
2005: Jan Feb Mar
Apr May June
July Aug Sept
Oct Nov Dec
2004: Jan Feb Mar
Apr May June
July Aug Sept
Oct Nov Dec
2003: Jan Feb Mar
Apr May June
July Aug Sept
Oct Nov Dec
2002: Jan Feb
Mar Apr May
June July
Aug Sept
Oct Nov Dec
2001: Jan Feb
Mar Apr May
Sept Oct
Nov Dec
|